Discussion about this post

User's avatar
N.J. (Nancy) Mastro's avatar

This was such a meaningful post for me. When I retired and finally had time to write, I considered an MFA. But I already have a master's and a doctorate in another field and didn't want another degree, I wanted skill and insight that I felt that I could get by taking a different route. Instead of paying tution to a college, I personalized my learning to enable me to learn what I needed, when I needed it.

This individualized approach has worked very well for me. I invested in hiring developmental editors to get 1-1 feedback from a professional, going to conferences, signing up for webinars, joining two critique groups, listening to podcasts on writing, reading craft books - and following people like you! You name it. There is so much out there right now. And I read a lot of well-written novels in my genre too.

But a personalized approach requires a great deal of motivation and self-directedness, which I knew I had. The result has been signing a contract for my first novel to come out in 2025. So can writing be taught? Yes! In oh so many ways! But I don't think a passion for writing or the kind of perservance that is required of a serious writer can be taught. Those must come from within. It's hard work, and there are a lot of stumbles that lead less determined people to give up. That said, passion and perseverance grow with becoming more skilled. It's very motivational to see the fruits of one's learning show up on the page.

My response so far has been about my preferred approach to learning writing. You also asked, how is writing best taught? That, too, depends on the learner's point of view. The best instruction I have had includes two key things: 1) Information on craft - here's what you need to know - in small bites; and 2) time to apply the new learning right in the workshop. The works particularly well when a person has a WIP to use as their sandbox, so to speak. Some of my best prose has come out of the classes and workshops that have provided participants with time to apply and process the point(s) which the instruction is trying to get across. A third piece would be sustained interaction with the instructor(s), such as over weeks or over days, which allows for a deeper dive, as well as recurring commitment on the part of the leaner. "One and done" sessions are less effective for application but are useful for building awareness.

Anyway, thanks for the post, and thanks for inviting comments!

Expand full comment
Emily Conway's avatar

Hi Anne, I can certainly relate to early 90s English departments and the thinking being done in them. I left a PhD program in English in the late 90s because I felt like the writing and thinking I was doing, didn’t serve enough of a real world purpose. Of course, there are arguments that could be made in both directions there, but the decision was the right one for me. I spent the next 25 years, mostly unable to write, stopping and starting, never really getting anywhere. in the meantime, I read and thought about words all the time and wrote in my head. A couple of years ago, at the end of a long cycle of internal healing, I started writing. I’d like to take some classes or workshops

at some point just to see what they’re like. But I do agree that reading and writing, and just keeping going, are the most important teachers. Thank you for your letters!

Expand full comment
30 more comments...

No posts